U.S. officials and state lawmakers are intensifying scrutiny of surveillance pricing—the use of personal data and algorithms to set different prices for the same product—after California’s bid to ban the practice missed a session deadline and the Federal Trade Commission moved to treat undisclosed personalization as a possible consumer-protection violation.
Continue reading
The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.
Unlocking the full article...
Contact us
Questions, corrections, or ideas? Send us a message here. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.
Thank you. Your message has been sent. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.Please enter your email address and a message.We could not send your message. Please try again in a little while.