A renewed debate is intensifying over whether the trial bar is standing in the way of autonomous vehicles, as critics accuse plaintiffs' lawyers of lobbying against self-driving cars to protect a lucrative pipeline of auto-accident litigation. The controversy resurfaced after economist Alex Tabarrok laid out the case in a widely circulated post on the blog Marginal Revolution, which argues that organized plaintiffs' attorneys have spent years opposing legislation that would ease the deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs).
Continue reading
The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.