The Wall Street Journal published a discussion in which three labor economists set out why predictions of AI's impact on employment range so widely — from new job creation to large-scale displacement — and defended their own positions. The participants were MIT's David Autor, the University of Virginia's Anton Korinek, and Martha Gimbel, who leads Yale University's Budget Lab, highlighting how the same technology and data can lead to opposite conclusions. Article
Continue reading
The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.