Leading AI researchers have challenged frontier AI companies to guarantee genuine independence for the safety evaluators they are embedding inside their labs, warning that current proposals lack sufficient structural protections to serve as credible oversight. More than 100 scientists and evaluators, including Geoffrey Hinton and Stuart Russell, published an open letter on September 18, 2026, laying out five non-negotiable conditions for meaningful third-party assessment: structural independence from the companies being evaluated, diverse viewpoints among evaluators, transparent publication of findings, full legal protections against retaliation, and unrestricted access to systems and internal staff.
Continue reading
The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.
Unlocking the full article...
Contact us
Questions, corrections, or ideas? Send us a message here. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.
Thank you. Your message has been sent. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.Please enter your email address and a message.We could not send your message. Please try again in a little while.